Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00338
Original file (PD2013 00338.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD1300338
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140429
SEPARATION DATE: 20050727


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a mobilized Reserve SPC/E-4 (62B/Construction Equipment Repairer) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) status post L4-S1 fusion without significant motor abnormality. In spite of surgery and other interventions, the back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3/S1 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Chronic LBP with radiculopathy was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Adjustment disorder with depressed mood, meeting retention standards, was also forwarded for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain status post L4-S1 fusion without significant motor abnormality” as unfitting, rated 20% citing “Range of motion limited by pain, antalgic gait.” The a djustment d isorder with depressed mood was determined to be not unfitting and therefore not rated. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated .


CI CONTENTION: “Rating too low during separation.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB, when specifically requested by the applicant. The ratings for conditions meeting the above criteria are addressed below. In addition, the Secretary of Defense directed a comprehensive review of Service members with certain mental health conditions referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 that were changed or eliminated during that process. The applicant was notified that he may meet the inclusion criteria of the Mental Health Review Terms of Reference. The mental health condition was reviewed regarding diagnosis change, fitness determination and rating in accordance with VASRD §4.129 and §4.130. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, may be eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050623
 VA - (3 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Low Back Pain s/p L4-S1 Fusion 5241 20% Failed Back Syndrome… 5299-5241 40% 20051018
Radiculopathy, Left LE 8599-8521 10% 20051018
Radiculopathy, Right LE 8599-8521 0% 20051018
Adjustment Disorder Not Unfitting Depression… 9434 0% 20051025
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 1 20051018
Rating: 20%
 Combined Rating: 50%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 60325 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation. The Board likewise acknowledges the CI’s contention for rating of his MH condition noted above which was determined to be not unfitting by the PEB; and, emphasizes that disability compensation may only be offered for those conditions that cut short the member’s career. Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements; a disability rating IAW the VASRD, and based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended.

Low Back Pain status post Fusion. In June 2003, the CI suffered a low back injury while lifting a heavy object. He experienced a sharp lumbar pain and within a short time began to have radiating pain into his legs. He was treated with duty restriction, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and narcotic medications. Treatment by physical therapy and pain management made the pain worse and he noted no response to epidural steroid injections. Magnetic resonance imaging study revealed Grade 1 spondylolisthesis (a 25% slippage of a vertebral body out of its normal position) with disc herniation at L5 and disc bulging at L3 & L4. In July 2004, he underwent an L4-5, L5-S1 decompression surgery with posterior arthrodesis (joint fusion). He stated that there was no improvement in his pain since the surgery. At the MEB exam performed 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported a history of back surgery with plates, screws and rods and that he felt very depressed with everything that happened. The MEB physical exam noted decreased sensation of the left lateral calf/foot. There were no muscle spasms in the lumbar spine and the “…attached ROM (range of motion) sheet…” was not present for review by the Board. The narrative summary (NARSUM) completed 2 months prior to separation noted that his LBP still radiated into his legs. The right was worse than the left and the pain went to the bottom of the foot and all of his toes. He denied any bowel or bladder dysfunction; however, his erectile dysfunction was attributed to the back pain. He had started a home exercise program and did alright using an exercise bike until resistance was added, at which point the pain became intolerable. The physical exam portion of the NARSUM was completed 3 months before the surgical procedure and is summarized below. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed 3 months after separation, the CI reported chronic lower back pain with radiculopathy to both legs. He used a hard body brace constantly and stated his condition did not cause incapacitation. His functional limitations included no sexual intercourse; he always used a walker, inability to drive and could only travel for short periods of time. The pertinent physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are as follows:
Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) NARSUM 2.5 Mo s . Pre- S ep VA C&P 3 Mo s . Post- S ep VA C&P 22 Mos. Post-Sep.
Flexion (90 Normal) 15 20 35
Combined (240) 70 100 90
Comment s
(Date of Surgery was 20040713) 		ROMs obtained 3.5 months prior to surgery; Pos. antalgic gait & painful motion ; S lightly decreased strength left leg; Neg. Straight leg raise (SLR); No sensory deficits ; Normal reflexes Pos. muscle spasm & tenderness; Pos. bilateral SLR; Pos. Deluca; Pos. weakness & sensory deficit left leg Pos. muscle spasm , painful motion, tenderness & bilateral SLR; Pos. Deluca criteria; Pos. sensory deficit left leg; Normal reflexes
§4.71 a Rating 40% 40% 40%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the chronic LBP status post spinal fusion by applying VASRD code 5241, spinal fusion, and rated it 20% citing “range of motion limited by pain, antalgic gait.” The Board is unclear what rating standards/prerogatives the PEB utilized. The VA applied VASRD code 5299-5241 and rated it 40% based on the ROM measurements documented on the C&P exam. The Board considered all evidence present for review and determined that the ROM measurement documented on the NARSUM were obtained prior to surgery and over 12 months prior to separation and therefore, are not relevant to its rating recommendation at the time of separation. The data reportedly contained in the MEB H&P dated 6 months prior to separation was not present for review by the Board. The only probative ROM data on which to base a rating recommendation are the VA C&P ROM measurements obtained 3 months after separation. Those values correspond to a 40% disability rating under the general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine. There is no data that would allow for a rating based on incapacitation under the intervertebral disc syndrome code and the VA C&P exam specifically stated that incapacitating episodes were not present. The VA also addressed the bilateral radiculopathy condition by applying the incomplete paralysis of a peripheral nerve and granted 10% for the left and 0% for the right. The Board considered whether an additional rating could be recommended under a peripheral nerve code, as conferred by the VA, for the associated radiculopathy at separation. Firm Board precedence requires a functional impairment linked to fitness to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating to service disability in spine cases. The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The sensory component in this case has no functional implications and the motor impairment was relatively minor and cannot be linked to significant functional consequence. There is thus no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with fitness implications) from the residual radiculopathy and, the Board cannot support a recommendation for an additional disability rating on this basis. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 40% for the chronic persistent LBP status post fusion condition.

Contended Adjustment d/o with depressed mood Conditions. The Board reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military DES and determined that no MH diagnosis was changed or eliminated to the applicant's possible disadvantage. This applicant therefore did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. The MH condition, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, was determined to be not unfitting by the PEB. The Board’s charge with respect to the MH condition referred for review that was determined to be not unfitting by the PEB is an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudication. The Board’s threshold for countering PEB not-unfit determinations requires a preponderance of evidence. There were three service treatment notes related to the CI’s MH condition present for review. Two notes were following the CI’s participation in group therapy and diagnosed him with personality disorder and one was for medication refills with the diagnosis of adjustment disorder. One note documented a euthymic mood with a broad affect. The psychiatric addendum prepared 2 months prior to separation contained the following historical information:

Service member was seen for the first time in the Behavioral Health Clinic on 14 June 2004. He was referred because he was complaining of hearing voices and seeing blurry images at night. He also reported having a short temper. He stated he attempted suicide six months prior to that and that he did not seek any treatment even though he had taken 30 pills. The diagnosis was Adjustment d/o with depressed mood. He stopped coming in June 2004 and did not reappear until January 2005. He reported still feeling depressed. He was finding surgery, his possible divorce, and having erectile dysfunction being stressful. He still complained about hearing voices instructing him to shoot his ex-wife and himself. When [the MH provider] on 25 January 2005 he still complained about seeing figures. However, [the MH provider] did not feel it was psychotic in nature. They seemed to be more of his conscious thoughts directed towards his ex-wife.

Mental status exam documented that the CI “ smiled very brightly ” and had a euthymic mood. He denie d suicidal/homicidal ideations and he still complain ed o f sleep problem s but believe d it was due to his back pain. He stated he occasionally still hear d voices and had no form of thought disorder. His speech was goal directed and linear. The examiner added the following opinion, “ I do not believe that he is truly experiencing psychotic symptoms but it is more tha n what he is experiencing is psychotic like symptoms that are seen in personality disorders. ” The diagnosis was a djustment disorder with depressed mood with mild impairment for military duty and social/industrial adaptability. He was also diagnose d with a p ersonality disorder , not otherwise specified, and assigned a Global Assessment of functioning of 85 (absent or minimal symptoms, good functioning in all areas, interested and involved in a wide range of activities, socially effective, generally satisfied with life, no more than everyday problems or concerns). The examiner stated that the CI did meet retention standards but recommended that the MH report be included in the CI’s MEB proceedings. The a djustment disorder with depressed mood was n ot profiled or implicated in the c ommander’s statement and w as not judged to fail retention standards. All were reviewed by the a ction o fficer and considered by the Board. There was no performance based evidence from the record that this condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the a djustment disorder with depressed mood condition and so no additional disability rating is recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board surmised from the PEB ruling in this case that a prerogative outside the VASRD was exercised and the condition was adjudicated independently of that prerogative by the Board. In the matter of the chronic persistent LBP status post fusion condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 40%, coded 5241 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the contended adjustment disorder with depressed mood condition, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determination as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Persistent Low Back Pain s/p Fusion 5241 40%
RATING 40%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130507, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

 invalid font number 31502 SAMR-RB                   
invalid font number 31502
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 invalid font number 31502 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
invalid font number 31502 for invalid font number 31502 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502 , AR20140013368 (PD201300338)

 invalid font number 31502
1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to recharacterize the individual’s separation as a permanent disability retirement with the combined disability rating of 40% effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum:

         a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         b. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will account for recoupment of severance pay, and payment of permanent retired pay at 40% effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         d. Affording the individual the opportunity to elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and medical TRICARE retiree options.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  invalid font number 31502 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01713

    Original file (PD2013 01713.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP) status post (s/p) L5/S1 fusion” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Should the Board judge that a condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements, a disability rating IAW the VASRD, based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended. invalid font number 31502 ” The CI had chronic LBP and ROM flexion limited to 80 degrees at the MEB exam.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01647

    Original file (PD2012 01647.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service FPEB – Dated 20030917VA (# Mo. The PEB used these rules to rate the chronic LBP condition, coded 5295 lumbosacral strain, and initially rated at 10% (with characteristic pain on motion). The Board notes that although they did not change the VASRD code, verbiage contained on the FPEB’s findings and recommendations document suggeststhe FPEB may have utilized VASRD code 5293, intervertebral disc syndrome (also in effect at the time of separation) to arrive at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02389

    Original file (PD-2013-02389.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The pain management examiner reevaluated the CI on 2 April 2008 and documented that there was residual pain, however the CI was not taking any pain medication; at rest the pain was zero to two and when he was actively working, the pain was in the three to five range. Additionally, the Board concluded, although the CI had some symptoms of depression, and depression might have been the predominant presentation of his adjustment disorder, there was insufficient evidence that any mental health...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00409

    Original file (PD2013 00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The chronic back pain and chronic neck pain conditions, characterized as “chronic neck pain and chronic back pain, with degenerative disc disease” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that his case may be eligible for review of the military disability evaluation of his MH condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00351

    Original file (PD-2014-00351.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The “General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01753

    Original file (PD-2013-01753.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neck Pain Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01533

    Original file (PD-2013-01533.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “TBI with residual neck pain and headaches;” “low back pain (LBP);” and “left knee pain with degenerative joint disease (DJD),” as unfitting, rated at 10%, 10%, and 0% respectively, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board could not find evidence in the commander’s statement or elsewhere in the treatment record that documented any significant interference of the neck pain condition with the performance of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02047

    Original file (PD-2013-02047.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Subjective Low Back Pain524110%Degenerative Disc Disease L4-5; S/P L4 Laminectomy; L5 Discectomy, Lumbar Spine524320%20050819Other x 0 (Not In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00334

    Original file (PD2013 00334.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In response to said notification, it is presumed that the CI has elected review by this Board for the MH condition(s) diagnosed after separation. Physical Disability Board of Review I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.